Physical Therapy Jobs Nationwide Logo
    
Forgot your password?
The source for physical, occupational, and speech therapy jobs
Facebook Twitter
Keyword Search Job Title Only 
Advanced Search | View All | International  
 
HealthPro Rehabilitation
 
Direct Access Limitation: Imaging? - What is the Right Direction for Physical Therapists and their Patients?
by Harrison Vaughan, PT, DPT, Cert. SMT - July 13, 2010   Bookmark and Share

I have noted Direct Access in the past through prior posts and a high supporter of the move to autonomous practice.  I feel this is the right direction for the profession not only for an acceptance as qualified clinicians by the medical field, but predominantly for the patients; whom, I feel, benefit significantly from our services that are currently limited.

This can be a long discussion and can veer down many paths, but I do want to hear from others mainly concerning the success of Direct Access (or even treatment as a whole) without imaging.  Even though I, you and many others (here and here) know that imaging is over-utilized, it is limiting us as a profession due to everyone wanting to get either an x-ray or MRI.

I recently wrote a post on the loss of the clinical exam here with a high number of responses so I know this is a hot topic.

Is it a type of subconscious way of feeling better inside for the individual or is this the way it has always been and will it change?

If our profession wants to advance further with autonomous practice, is getting the ability to order imaging (other than PTs in the military whom have this capability) needed to stay with the pack?

Are you comfortable treating without imaging?  How much of a mechanical response to our treatment is enough to be cleared?

What are you saying to your patients if you see them under Direct Access or even referral from a physician but have not had any imaging?  Or, how long do you treat under Direct Access until you decide that you, yourself, needs imaging to cover anything missed? 



 Harrison Vaughan, PT, DPT, Cert. SMT                                                                           
Harrison Vaughan, PT, DPT, Cert. SMT is a physical therapist at In Touch Therapy in South Hill, Virginia.  His clinical interests involve orthopedic and manual physical therapy, including clinical diagnostic tests.  He enjoys treating the spine but his dynamic work setting in a rural area provides an opportunity to treat a wide variety ranging from pediatrics to the neurological population.  Harrison received both his Bachelors of Science degree and Doctor of Physical Therapy from Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia. Dr. Vaughan is certified in Spinal Manipulative Therapy through the Spinal Manipulative Institute and American Academy of Manipulative Therapy. He is a member of the American Physical Therapy Association with a special subsection in Sports and Orthopedics and currently assists as Co-Chair of Technology position of the Virginia Physical Therapy Association.  More of Harrison’s blogs can be found at http://intouchpt.wordpress.com.





 
The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.

 

RECOMMEND THIS ARTICLE
You must be logged in
to recommend articles

Average (Not Rated)

0.0 stars
Comments  Add Your Comments
AR15 (NY) on 21 Jul 2010 at 4:08 pm

I am no against PTs having the ability to order imaging however I feel that imaging is very over rated and overused. It is a very rare occasion that a pt needs imaging. Especially patients who present without a traumatic event. Imaging in basic low back, neck, hip and knee pain is very much overused in the US. Patients with low back pain with no red flags often get imaging despite very good evidence that imaging is not needed. In my practice if I really think the patient needs imaging a quick call to PCP or a trip to the er and I have the image I want.

Mary Gardner PT (Niantic, CT) on 18 Jul 2010 at 1:51 am

I agree 100% with your concern of providing PT without imaging or waiting an excessive time. We all know that there is an inherent amount of healing occurs irrespective of palliative care. It is for those clients that are not fully tuned into their bodies or aware of unsual signs and don't report. Especially with spinal issues. I believe that PT's should be able to order imaging. When I was in Nicaragua I mentioned things in the clinic and voila they went down to the hospital and had the test done! This is in a third world country. The problem we have is our healthcare system is holding us hostage in providing under truly 'Best Practices" as the insurance companies are dictating what test can be done first and how long you have to wait . . . and who are these people that make these decisions. That is really what I want to know.

Add Your Comments
Display Name:
Location:
E-Mail Address:
Comments:
 
Enter numbers Why?
 
 
International Association of Employment Web Sites Member PM Technologies Power Zone